15 February 2019

How to Ban Guns in America


How to Ban Private Gun Ownership in America

It can be done. You just can’t do it in one fell swoop. You must do it in steps.
You take the first step in 1934 by making some kinds of guns bad, requiring them to be registered with the government and levying a special tax on them. This is to establish the idea that while some guns are OK, other guns are bad. This will be handy later on.
Image result for nfa restricted firearms
You take the next step in 1968. You pass laws adding more restrictions on gun ownership and sales, most notably establishing the requirement of a government-issued license for a business to sell guns. This will be handy later on.
Image result for FFL
Your next step is in 1993, when you pass a law creating certain classes of citizens who are prohibited from possessing guns, as well as adding a requirement that licensed dealers (created in 1968) run each prospective purchaser through an FBI background check before selling them a gun. This will be handy later on.
Image result for filling out 4473
It is now “later on.” It is 2019, and none of this has had any impact on criminal gun ownership. Although that is not the true objective, you point this out and insist that we must take yet another step.
Image result for house judiciary committee hearing hr 8
House Judiciary Committee advances HR 8 to markup.
So far you have managed to outlaw certain types of guns and certain types of gun owners, and to require that sales from licensed dealers obtain government permission before proceeding. The problem is that citizens are still allowed to transfer (some) guns to each other without the participation of a licensed dealer (1968) or a background check (1993).
This next step is to pass laws requiring “universal background checks.” (2019) This will now close the loop and ensure that no guns of any type (good or bad) are transferred to any citizen (good or bad) without government permission. And although some would say this is a “good first step,” they are now only two moves away from the end game.
From AWR Hawkins at Breitbart News.
The next step is to point out that “universal background checks” have been ineffective in reducing crime (though they were not intended to reduce crime) since you don’t know who in America owns all the guns. You can’t tell if people are complying with the background check law without gun registration. So you pass that law…to “close the loophole”…and now you have everything you need. All the pieces are in position to take the final step and eliminate private gun ownership in America…at least by law abiding citizens.

Let’s review:
We have established that some guns are bad, and the government decides what those are. (1934)
We have decided that some people are bad and prohibited from gun ownership, and the government decides who they are. (1993)
The government has a list of guns and gun owners. (?)
Remember, every time they pass another law, it is referred to as a “good first step”…right before the next one.

"You don't have to be Jewish to fight by our side."
You just have to love freedom.
© 2019 JPFO All rights reserved.
jpfo@jpfo.org
1-800-869-1884

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
America’s most aggressive civil rights organization
We make the NRA look like moderates

6 comments:

LindaG said...

Yup. That's what they always say.

Suz said...

Just scary is what it is...

Ed Bonderenka said...

There are bad words, very bad words, floating around in my head right now, struggling to get out.
I just know that I have a lot of guns and a lot of ammo, and they won't go quietly into that good night.

Vicki said...

It is getting closer what with Palosi's threat yesterday to have gun violence in the US declared a national emergency, which is political speak for gun grabbing. I can only speak for those in the northern part of my state, but they will have a really tough time separating those boys from their deer rifles. It will not be pretty.

Toirdhealbheach Beucail said...

Sadly, they are pushing people to the point that they have no choice and no manner of retreat. This does not end well.

Rev. Paul said...

All - I concur!