There's a reasonably even-handed op-ed piece in today's Daily News regarding the end of the earmark. Underdeveloped Alaska (and make no mistake, much of this place is still more akin to a third-world country than to a modern U.S. State) has benefited greatly from earmarks for specific infrastructure projects.
~ snip~
~ snip ~
Read the rest at the link, above.
2 comments:
I say let your Industries pay for the projects. I would reather pay higher for your goods and serves with the money would goto the people of Alaska then pay ay for them throught through my taxes.
I bealeave you get money back from the state in taxes each your due to the state leased oilfield.
Josh
Having driven over the Alaskan Highway from Destruction Bay, YT to Tok, AK--twice!--and having been on a goodly portion of the Dalton Highway (up to Coldfoot just north of the Arctic Circle, I feel comfortable in saying that having a dirt or gravel road (the Dalton Highway) in a land troubled by permafrost is the only sensible thing to do. That paved section of the Alaska Highway between Destruction Bay and Tok was pure hell with its moguls and crevasses created by the freeze-thaw cycle.
Post a Comment