I can't find much difference between most of the talking heads that lined up for last night's GOP debate.
Ron Paul is different because of his mostly-Constitutionalist, libertarian stance.
Newt Gingrich is running because he used to be somebody ... and/or because he used to know Ronald Reagan. Yawn.
Michelle Bachmann is getting there, but may need more seasoning.
Perry/Romney - two sides of the same coin. Newly-minted (ahem cough cough) conservatives, "my dad is bigger than your dad", pointing fingers as each claims more job creation than the other.
Perry's biggest failure of the night: when Romney said that Perry's predecessors in office (including George W. Bush) created even more jobs than Perry did, Perry missed a golden opportunity to point out that Bush et al didn't have to deal with the current economy.
There were some other folks up there, too, but ... whatever.
John 12:24 "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit."
3 comments:
I'm looking at Bachman as VP running mate material.
Sad fact is I'd vote for a yellow dog before any democrat.
I believe your comments are spot on with this one exception:
While I respect most of his views, Ron Paul is anti-war. His views on ignoring IRAN are pitifully naive and will get Israel (an us eventually) blown off the map... which leads me to my other thought... I'm not sure but I question is views on Israel.... they seem borderline antisemitic.
Post a Comment