Interesting, It also looks like a bear carrying a large fish in his mouth. Why is it all the photos of Bigfoot or any other legend are always fuzzy? just wondering is there that many bad cameras out there.
Regarding the out-of-focus, my old film camera used to be that way if I neglected to manually change the focus after zooming in. Modern cameras tend to refocus automatically ... or so I thought.
Ding ding. I think we have a winner with the bear. Honestly, what is up with bad cameras? Bigfoot, Loch Ness and now this? Can someone take a photography class, please? Those bears up there are huge, by the way.
And why is it only 10 seconds long? Couldn't the videographer have continued as the dang thing left the river for the banks? Seeing the legs would have solved the puzzle....Ooops! I think I just answered my own question!
6 comments:
Interesting, It also looks like a bear carrying a large fish in his mouth. Why is it all the photos of Bigfoot or any other legend are always fuzzy? just wondering is there that many bad cameras out there.
I had the same thought, re: bear w/ fish.
Regarding the out-of-focus, my old film camera used to be that way if I neglected to manually change the focus after zooming in. Modern cameras tend to refocus automatically ... or so I thought.
It had me until I read the suggestion about a bear with a fish, and then it looked like a bear with a fish to me too. Interesting story anyhow.
Bear with a fish.
Ding ding. I think we have a winner with the bear. Honestly, what is up with bad cameras? Bigfoot, Loch Ness and now this? Can someone take a photography class, please? Those bears up there are huge, by the way.
And why is it only 10 seconds long? Couldn't the videographer have continued as the dang thing left the river for the banks? Seeing the legs would have solved the puzzle....Ooops! I think I just answered my own question!
Post a Comment