I think of Nixon/McGovern. We didn't have "good" choices then but at least the candidates were diametrically opposed.
Now we have Twiddle-Dee and Twiddle-Dum - one with an R; t'other with a D. I'd have less concern if MA wasn't the East Coast CA. Makes 'em hard to tell apart.
But I'll likely go with R. Not because he's R - I'm not voting for "President" - but because he's not the incumbent and maybe there's a chance his selected underlings will be of more American sentiment than the current courtiers.
Maybe it'll really boil down to the VP choices.
(I guess the powers-that-be decided that delegate-count thingy only gets in the way of the desires of The Party)
3 comments:
Very good food for thought. Not voting at all is a definite vote for Obama. My idea has always been-- if you don't vote, don't complain!
Any point right of left is better than left.
I'm at the ABO stage but find Romney, while less than ideal, a far, far better option.
I think of Nixon/McGovern. We didn't have "good" choices then but at least the candidates were diametrically opposed.
Now we have Twiddle-Dee and Twiddle-Dum - one with an R; t'other with a D. I'd have less concern if MA wasn't the East Coast CA. Makes 'em hard to tell apart.
But I'll likely go with R. Not because he's R - I'm not voting for "President" - but because he's not the incumbent and maybe there's a chance his selected underlings will be of more American sentiment than the current courtiers.
Maybe it'll really boil down to the VP choices.
(I guess the powers-that-be decided that delegate-count thingy only gets in the way of the desires of The Party)
Q
Post a Comment