By Donald L. Cline. August 1st, 2018
The wave of fear mongering and carnival hucksterism currently sweeping our nation, promulgated by people who should know better and often do know better, about the supposedly devastating consequences to public safety occasioned by '3D Printed Guns,' is astonishing, appalling, and disgusting.
Undetectable by airport screening equipment? Nonsense. If the sub-millimeter array equipment at the TSA screening points can outline human genitals, and they can, then they can detect plastic guns. Also, even if the printed gun itself is undetectable, the bullets cannot be made undetectable. If the weapon is loaded, it is detectable like a searchlight in a tunnel. If bullets are anywhere else in the checked baggage, they are detectable.
Both are rights protected by our Constitution. Neither should be considered a violation or evidence of a crime. Besides, undetectable weapons have been illegal since 1988.
Untraceable? So what? It has probably been fifty years since a violent crime was solved by tracing down a serial number. The only purpose of a serial number is to find out who first bought the weapon from a dealer, and weapons involved in crime rarely, if ever, are in the possession of the person who first bought it. They are stolen, they are rented out by the local mob; they are passed around on the street. The cost of law enforcement firearm tracing is prohibitive, and is usually not completed by the time the perpetrator faces a judge anyway.
Oh, and by the way: It is perfectly legal to manufacture a firearm without a serial number for your own use. It is illegal to sell it, however.
Lastly, what criminal or even terrorist is going to spend $3,000 to $600,000 dollars for a 3D Printer or programmable CNC Mill so he can rip off the local stop-and-rob for a couple hundred bucks? Or even shoot up a school and then off himself to avoid accountability in this world (and face much more serious accountability in the next)?
All this fuss and fury is doing is identifying those poor snowflakes who live in a constant state of panic over the possibility that someone may have the equipment to defend themselves from lethal assault. And their manipulators who constantly crank out menacing hobgoblins with which to fuel their panic, all in the interests of justifying, by democratic vote, the destruction of the individual liberties our nation was founded to preserve and protect.
Donald L. Cline
Watching the news "reporting" on this subject gives cause for even more despair as non-facts are delivered with near total hysteria. Yet again the media goes into emotional melt down as they present misinformation and disinformation without bothering to check on real data - the whole thing has been blown up out of all proportion, and let's remember, ammunition is metallic and so are firing pins and springs. An 'invisible' gun? Yeah right.
© 2018 JPFO All rights reserved.
1-800-869-1884
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
8 comments:
Preaching to the choir here, Rev.....
The leftists are spinning up everything they can, true or not, and trotting it out.
I know, Jim, and you're right. As usual. :) But I thought the writer made some important points which deserve to be part of the discussion.
My biggest fear, is not Joe Scumbag making a gun, or the gang banger, its the terrorists. They will use them to bring down so many jets, at one time it will make 9-11 seem like a trial run.
I hear you, Rob, but I must concentrate on prepping/protecting my family. Just the same, I'm not overly impressed with the .gov's ability to spot threats. We have to remember that cops don't prevent crime; their job is to clean up the mess & assign blame.
The gun grabbing politicians, and their media allies, use firearms rhetoric to deflect explaining their utter failure to solve, or even mitigate, social problems IMO.
WSF - they have to lie; the truth would incriminate them, or at the very least, show how utterly stupid & ineffectual they are.
Like the first reactions to Glock.
Quite probably so, Ed. :)
Post a Comment