11 May 2010

RKBA: Alaska Constitution

Article I:
§ 19. Right to Keep and Bear Arms

A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be denied or infringed by the State or a political subdivision of the State.


Kind of the way it ought to be, don't you think?

3 comments:

DR said...

"Kind of the way it ought to be, don't you think?"

Amen!

Jenny said...

Well, it would be nice if the national culture didn't need the clarifying sentence, but I'm glad we have it here. :)

Anonymous said...

That last sentence seems awfully redundant to me. I assume it was added because of the current federal "Incorporation Doctrine" which is nothing less than LEGAL QUACKERY! The language of the Constitution clearly indicates the framers intent that restrictions on infringing the people’s rights applied against all levels of government throughout the land! Such as:

Art IV: ... "Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records and judicial Proceedings of every other State." AND, "The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.".

Art VI: "This Constitution...shall be the Supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.", and "... Senators and Representatives...and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the U.S. and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;..."

If that's not enough, then consider the 14th Amendment which basically RESTATES the original language quoted above.

Like I said before, all these "doctrines" etc. are nothing less than LEGAL QUACKERY perpetrated by corrupt legislatures and courts against the freedom and liberty of the people.

Neither the so-called Commerce Clause/Doctrine nor the "Police Powers doctrine" can be LEGITIMATELY used to usurp or infringe upon the people's or State's rights. Neither the President nor the U.S. Congress has the LEGITIMATE power to suspend fundamental rights under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDING the declaration of Martial Law! No provision of the Constitution may be used to disparage or deny enumerated OR OTHER rights retained by the people and/or the States!

No governmental authority in the World, and especially in the U.S., has the LEGITIMATE authority to enforce any law restricting or infringing upon fundamental human rights endowed upon mankind by our Creator! (I realize they have the POWER with the threat of deadly force to enforce unconstitutional "laws" but that's NOT the same as LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY.)

Unless a law deals solely with punishment for the use of a weapon in the commission of a crime, it is TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL regardless of what our corrupt courts have ruled!

The Declaration of Independence is just as applicable today as it was at the time it was first written and the tyrannies we face today EXCEED those for which our founding fathers felt compelled to fight with deadly force.

Just sayin'

Spook