22 February 2011

Alaska Legislator Objects to "Pat Down" by TSA

State Rep. Sharon Cissna, a breast-cancer survivor who had a mastectomy, refused to submit to what she termed as "an invasive, probing pat-down".

Cissna sent out a statement late Monday saying the body scan showed scars from her breast cancer. She said she knew that meant there would be "invasive, probing hands of a stranger," and that a similar incident had happened three months earlier.

"Facing the agent I began to remember what my husband and I'd decided after the previous intensive physical search. That I never had to submit to that horror again!" she said. "It would be difficult, we agreed, but I had the choice to say no, this twisted policy did not have to be the price of flying to Juneau!"
~ snip ~
"She's standing up not just for her but other people, particularly women ... What's really, really terrible and just scandalous is that these procedures do little or nothing to enhance security of our flight, and really are nothing more than security theater," said Scott McMurren, an Anchorage-based travel marketing consultant.

What he said, and good for her.

Rep. Cissna elected to drive part of the way, and then take a boat for the remainder of the journey. I wish more Americans would stand up to the unconstitutional invasions of privacy being imposed on the innocent citizens of what used to be a free country.
Read more at the link.
* * * * *
In other news, thanks to federal imposition on free enterprise here (and elsewhere; let's be honest), south-central Alaska is being threatened with a natural-gas shortage again.
Next winter, Southcentral Alaskans will face a greater risk of needing to turn down their thermostats, switch off their lights or take other emergency measures due to a new setback for the region's gas supply.
The region's electricity and gas providers will lose one of their backstops for avoiding gas delivery disruptions during extreme cold snaps and equipment breakdowns. 

The problem may last for only a year or two, but in the meantime, the utilities are worried about the loss of their stopgap: the oil-company-owned gas export plant in Nikiski.

It's a cruel irony: The decision to close the export plant later this year could provide billions of additional cubic feet of gas for Southcentral Alaska, but the utilities can't absorb it. The utilities can't purchase any more gas than what they can use immediately because they have no place to store it.
Officials say the problem will be remedied in a few years due to a multimillion-dollar project under way to store gas in a depleted gas reservoir under the Kenai River.

So who needs heat & light? Read more at the link.

6 comments:

Jenny said...

Frankly, I'm impressed she couldn't/didn't get an Only Ones pass. Good.

One step closer to scrapping that nonsense.

... now if we can just make sure the *federal* level folks have to go through it with the rest of us to.

Steven M Nielson said...

About the natural gas, etc... don't you guys have endless forests to use for fuel? Since when did the entire population of Alaska become dependent on the grid? I thought people moved there to get off the grid, get away from the demands of the lower 48... At least you guys can look forward to some more help from Chavez, right ;)

Cassie said...

It's just creepy that they are doing this. I got patted down in Spokane, but it was harmless. Heard so many horror stories similar to this one...but little choice in most cases. I mean if she was wearing a birka it would be a diff. story...Ahhh, but then she probably would have been flagged through!! (Is my bias showing?)

The leftist idiots that are cheering for the Muslim Brotherhood over in Egypt are also cheering for gas prices going up here (whether they know it or not) and a whole nother can of worms now opened. I'm bummed out. :>(

Rev. Paul said...

Jenny, I'm astonished that the authorities didn't have her arrested or something, for refusing. The rest of get fined for that.

Steven, the local electric companies use natural gas and/or coal to generate, as the gas has historically been cheap & easy to obtain. The Cook Inlet supply is now dwindling, and the forests are mostly tied up in Federal parklands - so we can't use our own trees. It is a fact, however, that we have enough coal to power Alaska for another 200 years, if we started today. While many homes here have their own generators and wood stoves, the EPA gets in the State's collective face about the air quality as soon as the temps drop below 20 degrees. Too much smoke, they say. Too much Federal butting-in, says I.

Steven M Nielson said...

Oh, Rev... you're thinking 18th century... coal? Wood? What about all the green technologies that the One has promised you and your fellow countrymen? Shouldn't the thought of green energy be enough to keep you Alaskans warm at night ;)

Rev. Paul said...

According to Sarah Palin (and I admit I haven't researched this myself, but she WAS chairman of the State's Oil & Gas Commission), Alaska already gets 25% of its energy from "alternative" sources. I mention the oil, natural gas & coal because that's what our local electric companies use to generate the juice.