27 July 2012

Gun Control Tacked Onto the Cybersecurity Bill

Here we go again. From our friend Larry Correia:

Just a heads up. http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure  It is from the usual suspects, Schumer, Lautenberg, Boxer, and Feinstein.

And when somebody tells you that the democrats aren’t in favor of gun control anymore, and it is a dead issue, and it is just silly to think that Obama wants to take your guns, blah blah friggin’ blah, laugh in their face. Because if the democrats are willing to push a magazine ban 4 months before the election, you know damn good and well what they are will be willing to do when Obama is in his second term.

Meanwhile, call your congressman and tell them to block this crap.

You know what to do.

7 comments:

Matt said...

They simply cannot help themselves. It's their nature to try and control us and place us under their collective thumb.

Rev. Paul said...

That's it, exactly.

Murphy's Law said...

Even if The Zero gets beat bad this election, he's still got two months a sa lame duck to hose us all with no fear of repercussion.

Rev. Paul said...

ML - true. The only good thing is that with the Repubs in control of the House, they have the potential to derail yet another bad law.

And note I said "potential"; I'm not putting anything past those folks.

Anonymous said...

It's for the children!

joated said...

"The usual suspects" all Democrats from California, New York and New Jersey, it seems. They are a collection of the walking dead (Lautenberg) and the brain dead.

How and why they continue to get elected is a mystery to me. It's not like they have actually ever done anything to better the lives of their constituents. (Okay maybe a few individuals with strong connections, stomachs and weak moral sense.) Every act they propose or sponser is designed to control and infringe upon the people.

Groundhog said...

I'm sure it was only a few "reasonable restrictions". Nothing anyone with a shred of human dignity could possibly object to. (sheesh, hard to write that without throwing up a little in my mouth...)

Go check out Bob S today. He actually got one in his comments section. I linked it on my blog.